2025 August:
The "1 Install = 1 License" Fallacy: Why Traditional Software Licensing Models Are Obsolete in 2025 and Beyond
In the realm of software asset management (SAM), few concepts have persisted as stubbornly as the notion that "one install equals one license." This paradigm, rooted in the era of floppy disks, CD-ROMs, and perpetual ownership, once made perfect sense: buy a copy, install it on a machine, and manage compliance by counting seats or devices. Fast-forward to 2025, and this thinking has become a dangerous fallacy. With the dominance of cloud computing, subscription-based services, and dynamic usage models, equating installations to licenses not only oversimplifies reality but also exposes organizations to compliance risks, inflated costs, and inefficient resource allocation. As SAM professionals, we must adapt to a world where software is no longer a static asset but a fluid service. This report explores the evolution of licensing, dissects why the "1 install = 1 license" model is a relic, highlights emerging challenges, and offers forward-looking strategies for thriving in 2025 and beyond. Drawing on industry trends and expert insights, we'll uncover how to navigate this shift for better cost control, compliance, and innovation.
The Historical Roots: When "1 Install = 1 License" Ruled
Three decades ago, software licensing was straightforward. Perpetual models dominated, where a one-time purchase granted indefinite use on a specific device or user. Think Microsoft Office 95 or early enterprise tools from IBM—each installation required its own license, enforced via serial keys or hardware dongles. This per-seat or per-install approach aligned with physical distribution and limited connectivity, making SAM a matter of inventory tracking and audits.However, as digital transformation accelerated, cracks appeared. The rise of the internet in the late 1990s enabled always-on updates and remote validation, paving the way for more flexible—but vendor-controlled—models. By the 2010s, Software as a Service (SaaS) exploded, decoupling licensing from physical installs. Today, in 2025, this old equation is not just outdated; it's a fallacy that can mislead SAM strategies and lead to over- or under-provisioning.
The Shift to Modern Models: Subscriptions, SaaS, and Beyond
The fallacy crumbles under the weight of evolving licensing paradigms. Perpetual licensing, once the gold standard, is fading as vendors prioritize recurring revenue for sustained development and profitability.
Instead, we're seeing:
Subscription and SaaS Dominance: Most new software in 2025 is released as subscription-based, with SaaS accounting for virtually all consumer and enterprise launches.
Unlike perpetual models, subscriptions grant access across multiple devices per user, often with limits based on seats, features, or usage rather than installs. For instance, Microsoft 365 allows installations on up to five devices per license, but the focus is on ongoing payments—not one-time buys.
This shift provides vendors with predictable income while offering users automatic updates and scalability, but it erodes the "ownership" feel of traditional licensing.
Usage-Based and Outcome-Based Pricing: By 2026, 59% of software monetization is expected to be usage-based, with 60% shifting to outcome or value-based models.
Here, fees correlate with metrics like API calls, data processed, or business results achieved—not installations. AWS and Azure exemplify this, charging for compute hours or storage, making "installs" irrelevant in serverless environments.
Hybrid and Token-Based Innovations: Emerging models blend elements, such as token-based licensing where "tokens" represent flexible units redeemable for features or usage.
Dual licensing (e.g., GPL for open-source users and commercial for enterprises) adds layers, allowing free access while monetizing restrictions.
Oracle's 2025 models, for example, layer cloud adoption with intricate metrics like CPU cores, further complicating per-install tracking.
These changes reflect a broader trend: software is now a service, not a product. As one industry observer notes, "Perpetual software licensing is coming to an end. SaaS is the future."
For SAM teams, this means shifting from counting installs to monitoring consumption, as evidenced by rising license waste—averaging $21 million annually per organization in unused SaaS licenses.
Why It's a Fallacy in 2025: The Cloud Era's Realities
In 2025, equating installs to licenses ignores the cloud's transformative impact. Hybrid and multi-cloud setups dominate, with 90% of enterprises using multiple providers.
Software runs dynamically—scaling up during peaks, auto-provisioning resources—making static install counts obsolete.
Decoupled Access and Installs: A single subscription might enable access on dozens of virtual machines or containers, with no "install" in the traditional sense. Serverless computing (e.g., AWS Lambda) executes code on-demand without persistent installations.
AI and Automation Integration: AI-driven licensing is emerging, using predictive analytics to forecast usage and optimize costs.
Tools like AI governance in SAM platforms automate compliance, but they track behaviors, not installs.
By 2025, AI transforms SAM from reactive to proactive, identifying underutilized assets in real-time.
Regulatory and Security Pressures: Evolving SaaS contracts emphasize data liability, privacy, and compliance (e.g., GDPR updates), shifting focus to usage audits over install inventories.
Vendors like Microsoft have phased out perpetual licensing for products like Dynamics NAV, pushing users to cloud subscriptions for better security.
The fallacy's danger? It leads to over-licensing (paying for unused installs) or under-compliance (missing usage spikes). As cloud spend management tops challenges (84% of organizations cite it),
clinging to old models exacerbates waste and audit risks.
SAM Challenges in the Post-Fallacy World
The cloud era amplifies SAM hurdles, demanding new tools and mindsets:
Challenge
Description
Impact on SAM
Visibility Gaps
Multi-cloud environments obscure usage; traditional tools fail in dynamic setups.
High waste (e.g., 14.2% YoY increase in unused licenses).
Compliance Complexity
Usage-based models require real-time tracking; audits focus on metrics like data throughput.
Rising fines and vendor price hikes (e.g., enterprise software upticks in 2025).
Cost Optimization
Subscriptions encourage "set it and forget it," leading to sprawl.
Ballooning budgets; 77% cite security alongside costs.
Decentralized IT
Shadow IT and AI tools proliferate, bypassing central SAM.
Fragmented control, increasing risks.
Manual tracking is futile; cloud-native SAM solutions are essential by 2025.
Future Trends: Licensing in 2030 and Beyond
Looking ahead, the fallacy will deepen as innovations reshape licensing:
AI-Powered Management: Automation will predict needs, simulate scenarios, and enforce policies, reducing human error.
Hyperscaler Marketplaces: Platforms like AWS and Azure will centralize procurement, blending licensing with ecosystem services.
Outcome-Focused Models: Pay for results (e.g., AI-driven insights), not usage, with GenAI enhancing personalization.
Sustainability and Ethics: Licenses may tie to green computing metrics, with open-source hybrids gaining traction for cost savings.
SAM will integrate with FinOps for holistic cost governance.
Best Practices for SAM Professionals in 2025
To combat the fallacy:
Adopt Cloud-Native Tools: Use platforms like Flexera or Zylo for real-time visibility.
2 sources
Focus on Usage Analytics: Track metrics over installs; implement AI for forecasting.
Negotiate Smart Contracts: Push for flexible terms in SaaS deals, including exit clauses.
Educate Stakeholders: Train teams on modern models to curb shadow IT.
Regular Audits and Optimization: Simulate costs and reclaim unused licenses quarterly.
Conclusion: Embracing the Fluid Future of Software Assets
The "1 install = 1 license" fallacy is a vestige of a bygone era, ill-suited for 2025's dynamic, cloud-centric landscape. By recognizing this, SAM teams can pivot to proactive strategies that minimize waste, ensure compliance, and drive value. As software evolves toward AI-infused, outcome-based models, those who adapt will thrive—turning potential pitfalls into opportunities for efficiency and innovation. In the words of industry leaders, the future belongs to those who own the cloud, not chase it.
Stay vigilant, stay informed, and redefine your SAM playbook for the years ahead.
2025 April:
Software Asset Management Update: Tackling Licensing Complexity in Hybrid Cloud Environments (2025)
As organizations increasingly adopt hybrid cloud architectures in 2025, combining on-premises systems with public clouds like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, software asset management (SAM) faces unprecedented licensing complexity. The dynamic nature of hybrid environments—blending legacy infrastructure with scalable cloud resources—creates significant challenges in tracking, optimizing, and ensuring compliance for software licenses. This update explores these challenges and how modern SAM strategies, integrated with FinOps, are addressing them.
Licensing Challenges in Hybrid Clouds
Hybrid cloud environments introduce intricate licensing hurdles. Public cloud platforms rely on automation, containerization (e.g., Kubernetes), and serverless computing, which obscure visibility into software usage. For instance, ephemeral workloads can spin up thousands of instances, each potentially triggering license consumption for tools like Oracle Database or Microsoft SQL Server. Meanwhile, on-premises systems often operate under perpetual licenses, creating a mismatch with cloud-based pay-per-use models. This duality leads to over-licensing in the cloud (e.g., provisioning excessive licenses for peak loads) or under-licensing on-premises, risking compliance violations. According to a 2025 Flexera report, 68% of enterprises cited hybrid cloud licensing as a top compliance challenge, with 45% facing audit penalties due to misconfigurations.
The rise of multi-cloud strategies further complicates matters. Organizations using multiple providers—each with unique licensing terms (e.g., AWS’s BYOL vs. Azure’s Hybrid Benefit)—struggle to maintain a unified license inventory. Decentralized DevOps teams exacerbate this, independently deploying software without centralized oversight, leading to shadow IT and license sprawl. For example, a single team’s use of unlicensed SaaS tools can incur unexpected costs or legal risks.
SAM Solutions with FinOps Integration
To address these challenges, SAM programs in 2025 are evolving with FinOps integration. Advanced SAM tools, like Snow Software and ServiceNow, now leverage AI-driven analytics to provide real-time visibility into license usage across hybrid environments. These platforms track containerized workloads, serverless functions, and on-premises assets, reconciling them with vendor agreements. For instance, Snow’s 2025 update introduced automated license optimization for Kubernetes, reducing over-provisioning by 30%.
FinOps complements SAM by embedding cost governance into licensing strategies. By integrating SAM data with FinOps platforms (e.g., Cloudability, Apptio), organizations gain a holistic view of license costs and usage, enabling dynamic allocation based on workload demands. This approach has cut licensing costs by 25% for 60% of enterprises surveyed by Gartner in 2025. Additionally, FinOps-driven policies enforce compliance through automated alerts for license violations, reducing audit risks.
Best Practices for 2025
Centralize License Management: Use SAM tools to create a single source of truth for licenses across hybrid clouds.
Integrate FinOps: Align SAM with FinOps for cost and compliance optimization, leveraging real-time analytics.
Automate Compliance Checks: Deploy AI tools to monitor usage and flag non-compliance instantly.
Train DevOps Teams: Educate teams on licensing policies to prevent shadow IT.
By embracing these strategies, organizations can navigate the licensing complexities of 2025, ensuring cost efficiency, compliance, and operational agility in hybrid cloud environments.
2023 Feb 23:
The State of the Cloud reports from #Flexera provide a comprehensive overview of the cloud computing industry, tracking trends, challenges, and best practices. The reports are based on surveys of IT professionals and decision-makers, providing insights into how organizations are adopting cloud technologies and the challenges they face in doing so.
One of the most significant trends that emerged from the State of the Cloud reports is the growing adoption of cloud computing across all industries and sectors. #cloudcomputing technology has become the new normal, with most organizations adopting cloud technologies for some part of their operations.
The reports also highlight the increasing complexity of cloud environments, with many organizations using multiple clouds and cloud-based services. This complexity can create challenges in managing cloud infrastructure and ensuring security and compliance.
Another key trend highlighted is the growing importance of cost optimization and management. Cloud services can be costly, and organizations need to be able to manage and optimize their cloud spending to ensure they are getting the most value from their investments.
The reports also highlight the increasing importance of security in the cloud, with many organizations concerned about data breaches and other security threats. Cloud providers are responding to these concerns by providing more robust security features and services.
The yearly publication also provide insights into emerging cloud technologies, such as serverless computing, containers, and microservices. These technologies offer new opportunities for organizations to build and deploy applications in the cloud, but they also come with new challenges and complexities.
In addition to tracking trends and challenges, it also offer best practices and recommendations for organizations looking to adopt cloud technologies. These include strategies for cost optimization, security, and managing cloud complexity.
Overall, the State of the Cloud reports from Flexera provide a valuable resource for IT professionals and decision-makers looking to stay up-to-date with the latest trends and best practices in cloud computing. The reports highlight the growing importance of cloud technology across all industries and sectors, and offer insights into the challenges and opportunities that come with cloud adoption.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7034652652122570752
2023 Jan 26
BOMBSHELL news from Oracle. On Monday, Jan 23, 2023, Oracle published their new Java Global Price List, making major changes to the once-free software. The change is being broadcast as pretty straightforward. We disagree.
There are extreme caveats that not many shops are discussing openly yet.
1. People: How do you count your people? Oracle says you need to count full time, part time, and temporary employees. Simple enough. But in addition, you also need to count full time, part time, and temporary employees of “your agents, contractors, outsourcers, and consultants that support your internal business operations.”
What does that mean? If you have 3rd party staff hired in on contract from HCL, Wipro, Deloitte, SoftwareONE, or similar, you probably should count them.
What about your cafeteria staff? What about your landscaping staff? Maybe, but probably not, because while these are employees of your agents, contractors, outsourcers, or consultants, they don’t actually support your internal business operations. You might decide differently. Meet with your internal teams to discus and proceed accordingly.
2. Processors: You need to do a deep dive of your overall architecture to determine how many Processors are involved where Java is “installed and/or running”. For this count, you do not need to count your desktops and laptops.
So, you’ll want to focus on servers. Clusters. Hosts. Guests. Virtual. Physical. Standalone. And Cloud!
Technically, you’ll need to dive deeper into your processors, model by model, to determine which Oracle Core Factor to apply to your different classes of Processors.
3. Installed and/or running: Oracle doesn’t provide a technical definition of what this means, but you should anticipate a debate over the deepest technical meanings of these words with regard to your virtual environment(s) with regard to Oracle’s infamous Partitioning Policy that takes a hard stance against VMWare.
4. Additional License: From the latest price list - “If your use exceeds 50,000 Processors, exclusive of Processors installed and/or running on desktop and laptop computers, You must obtain an additional license from Oracle.”
So has Oracle really done away with the dual license offerings from years past? (Named User Plus and Processor).
Read the language again. If you have more than 50,000 processors you must obtain “an additional license” from Oracle.
There’s no further information or knowledge on what that additional license looks like. Is it some combination of your total headcount plus processor metrics?
In summary, the Java situation seems on surface to have been simplified, but in our option, not entirely, especially for larger companies who have large, complex environments.
Let’s watch how things develop.
https://lnkd.in/grwmmqdx
https://lnkd.in/gmnH4erY
#java #javalicense
https://www.linkedin.com/company/case-itam
2023 Jan 3:
FinOps?
What's the intersection between SAM & FinOps? This capability examines the integrations required between FinOps and IT Asset Management (ITAM), including software asset management (SAM), and with the related but separate discipline of IT Service Management (ITSM) including configuration management.
IT Asset Management is a discipline used by organizations for lifecycle tracking and reporting on assets – hardware, software, software licenses, and other assets both tangible and intangible – used in the IT infrastructure to deliver value. Typically IT Asset management focuses costs (purchase, support), risks (ensuring that assets are used in accordance with regulatory and contractual requirements), and value/ROI of these assets for the organization.
ITSM configuration management tracks configuration items (CIs) and their relationships to IT services. The scope of ITSM configuration management is primarily focused on asset configuration (settings, relationships, and groupings) during the use phase of the lifecycle. ITSM also focuses on ensuring that IT services and their components are tracked and manage to support the provision of high quality IT services to the organization, from when they are procured or created until the time they are retired from use.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/case-itam
We are super-excited to introduce our latest suite of enterprise-grade Software Asset Management consulting and labor services. Need help managing your corporate software licensing? Caught in the crosshairs of a nasty publisher audit? We're here to help. #software #softwareassetmanagement #SAM #servicenow #flexera
Read more
https://www.linkedin.com/company/case-itam